Ponder This:

Real public servants are free enterprising individuals who, inspired, embrace challenge, take risks, and create, sometimes big, and often, they create jobs in the process, all out of their ideas, and self initiative...

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Oops!!! Uh-Oh. AFT in CT accidentally posted a secret 19 page slide presentation: How Connecticut Diffused the Parent Trigger

Memo From Whitney Tilson Aug 3, 2011 1:08PM PT
Apparently, the [American Federation of Teachers] AFT in Connecticut accidentally posted on its web site a secret 19-page slide presentation (attached) entitled How Connecticut Diffused the Parent Trigger, laying out how it was able to neuter reformers’ attempt to pass parent trigger legislation similar to what California enacted in late 2009 (thanks in large part to the leadership of then state senator Gloria Romero, who now heads DFER-CA).  RiShawn Biddle of Dropout Nation captured and downloaded it before the AFT realized its mistake, and has reposted it at: http://rishawnbiddle.org/outsidereports/aft_parentpower_guide.pdf.
It is stunning – there is so much juicy stuff here (though most of it won’t be a surprise to veterans of fights with the unions):
        The AFT’s first line of defense is “Plan A: Kill Mode” (nice image; how ironic that elsewhere, the AFT document complains that the term parent trigger “has a disturbing connotation”)
        Then, if the AFT can’t kill the bill, its next line of defense is to “engage the opposition” (meaning dupe them), which appeared to work, as the final outcome was legislation that allows the formation of “School Governance Councils” that have the “authority to recommend reconstitution in third year of poor performance” (whatever that means).  Translation: the AFT’s strategy was to trick parents into joining committees that appear to have power, but actually are only advisory.  Very clever.  Thank goodness this cynical strategy is being exposed.
       The icing on the cake is that the AFT talks smack about the local NEA affiliate, CEA, saying “CEA thought it would go away if they just ignored it” and how the AFT “Dragged CEA along kicking and screaming because teachers had to be united” (the NEA is going to love reading that)

Here’s is RiShawn’s take on it:
The AFT’s Real Feelings About Parent Power
Three Thoughts No Comments by RiShawn Biddle

When the AFT offers a road map on how to shut down Parent Power efforts, it offers a nice PDF document to do it. Apparently in a fit of celebration during last month’s TEACH 2011 conference, the nation’s second-largest teachers union offered up a presentation on how its Connecticut affiliate managed to make the state’s Parent Trigger law a little less harder for parents to use. (Dropout Nation is doing everyone a courtesy by making it available for public consumption; the original is still available at the AFT’s Web site. At least, for now.)

This included arguing that parents groups weren’t at the table for the discussions that led to the passage of the law. (Gwen Samuel and former state representative Jason Barlett, who had led the effort to pass the Parent Trigger law, will find that statement quite amusing.) It also includes declaring that it brought the Nutmeg State’s NEA affiliate “kicking and screaming” to the negotiations because “teachers had to be united.” Again, the NEA will probably find this very amusing.

Whatever one thinks of the document, it clearly offers a lesson for school reformers and Parent Power activists everywhere: The debate over reforming American public education isn’t going to let up anytime soon.

Update: The AFT has taken down the document. Dropout Nation continues to have a copy available.
Post a Comment

Botched Paramilitary Police Raids: An Epidemic of "Isolated Incidents"

"If a widespread pattern of [knock-and-announce] violations were shown . . . there would be reason for grave concern." —Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, in Hudson v. Michigan, June 15, 2006. An interactive map of botched SWAT and paramilitary police raids, released in conjunction with the Cato policy paper "Overkill: The Rise of Paramilitary Police Raids," by Radley Balko. What does this map mean? How to use this map View Original Map and Database


Death of an innocent. Death or injury of a police officer. Death of a nonviolent offender.
Raid on an innocent suspect. Other examples of paramilitary police excess. Unnecessary raids on doctors and sick people.
The proliferation of SWAT teams, police militarization, and the Drug War have given rise to a dramatic increase in the number of "no-knock" or "quick-knock" raids on suspected drug offenders. Because these raids are often conducted based on tips from notoriously unreliable confidential informants, police sometimes conduct SWAT-style raids on the wrong home, or on the homes of nonviolent, misdemeanor drug users. Such highly-volatile, overly confrontational tactics are bad enough when no one is hurt -- it's difficult to imagine the terror an innocent suspect or family faces when a SWAT team mistakenly breaks down their door in the middle of the night. But even more disturbing are the number of times such "wrong door" raids unnecessarily lead to the injury or death of suspects, bystanders, and police officers. Defenders of SWAT teams and paramilitary tactics say such incidents are isolated and rare. The map above aims to refute that notion.

Blog Archive